Feminist film theory is
theoretical film criticism derived from feminist politics and feminist theory.
Feminists have many approaches to cinema analysis, regarding the film elements
analyzed and their theoretical underpinnings.
The development of
feminist film theory was influenced by second wave feminism and the development
of women's studies in the 1960s and '70s. Feminist scholars began taking cues
from the new theories arising from these movements to analyzing film. Initial
attempts in the United States in the early 1970s were generally based on
sociological theory and focused on the function of women characters in
particular film narratives or genres and of stereotypes as a reflection of a
society's view of women. Works such as Marjorie Rosen’s Popcorn Venus: Women,
Movies, and the American Dream (1973) and Molly Haskell’s From Reverence to
Rape: The Treatment of Women in Movies (1974) analyze how the women portrayed
in film related to the broader historical context, the stereotypes depicted,
the extent to which the women were shown as active or passive, and the amount
of screen time given to women.
In contrast, film
theoreticians in England began integrating perspectives based on critical
theory and drawing inspiration from psychoanalysis, semiotics, and Marxism.
Eventually these ideas gained hold within the American scholarly community in
the later 1970s and 1980s. Analysis generally focused on what was described as
"the production of meaning in a film text, the way a text constructs a
viewing subject, and the ways in which the very mechanisms of cinematic
production affect the representation of women and reinforce sexism".
British feminist film
theorist Laura Mulvey is best known for her essay Visual Pleasure and Narrative
Cinema, written in 1973 and published in 1975 in the influential British film
theory journal Screen. The essay later appeared in a collection of her essays
entitled Visual and Other Pleasures, as well as in numerous other anthologies.
Her article, which was influenced by the theories of Sigmund Freud and Jacques
Lacan, is one of the first major essays that helped shift the orientation of
film theory towards a psychoanalytic framework. Prior to Mulvey, film theorists
such as Jean-Louis Baudry and Christian Metz used psychoanalytic ideas in their
theoretical accounts of the cinema. Mulvey's contribution, however, inaugurated
the intersection of film theory, psychoanalysis and feminism.
In his essay from The
Imaginary Signifier, "Identification, Mirror," Christian Metz argues
that viewing film is only possible through scopophilia (pleasure from looking,
related to voyeurism), which is best exemplified in silent film.
According to Cynthia A.
Freeland in "Feminist Frameworks for Horror Films," feminist studies
of horror films have focused on psychodynamics where the chief interest is
"on viewers' motives and interests in watching horror films". More recently, scholars
have expanded their work to include analysis of television and digital media.
Additionally, they have begun to explore notions of difference, engaging in
dialogue about the differences among women (part of movement away from essentialism
in feminist work more generally), the various methodologies and perspectives
contained under the umbrella of feminist film theory, and the multiplicity of
methods and intended effects that influence the development of films. Scholars
are also taking increasingly global perspectives, responding to postcolonialist
criticisms of perceived Anglo- and Eurocentrism in the academy more generally.
Increased focus has been given to, "disparate feminisms, nationalisms, and
media in various locations and across class, racial, and ethnic groups
throughout the world".
Realism and counter
cinema
The early work of
Marjorie Rosen and Molly Haskell on representation of women in film was part of
a movement to make depictions of women more realistic both in documentaries and
narrative cinema. The growing female presence in the film industry was seen as
a positive step toward realizing this goal, by drawing attention to feminist
issues and putting forth alternative, more true-to-life views of women.
However, Rosen and Haskell argue that these images are still mediated by the
same factors as traditional film, such as the "moving camera, composition,
editing, lighting, and all varieties of sound." While acknowledging the
value in inserting positive representations of women in film, some critics
asserted that real change would only come about from reconsidering the role of
film in society, often from a semiotic point of view.
Claire Johnston put forth
the idea that women's cinema can function as "counter cinema".
Through consciousness of the means of production and opposition of sexist
ideologies, films made by women have the potential to posit an alternative to
traditional Hollywood films. In reaction to this article, many women filmmakers
have integrated "alternative forms and experimental techniques" to
"encourage audiences to critique the seemingly transparent images on the
screen and to question the manipulative techniques of filming and
editing".
Reference
Erens, Patricia.
“Introduction” Issues in Feminist Film Criticism. Patricia Erens, ed.
Bloomington: Indiana University Press
Braudy and Cohen, Film
Theory and Criticism, Sixth Edition, Oxford University Press, 2004
McHugh, Kathleen and
Vivian Sobchack. “Introduction: Recent Approaches to Film Feminisms.
Johnston, Claire.
"Women’s Cinema as Counter Cinema." Sexual Stratagems: The World of
Women in Film. Patricia Erens, ed. New York: Horizon Press, 1979
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_film_theory
No comments:
Post a Comment